Wednesday, March 22, 2006

Review: Tyler Perry's Madea's Family Reunion

I recently gave into temptation and ventured to see the latest offering from Tyler Perry, aka Black Jesus. I call him such because whatever the man touches turns into gold. Even though many of his plays are purchased "bootleg" style he seems to radiate wealth. If you are not with the African-American subculture I am afraid you may not be aware of Mr. Perry except for his films. Madea has been a creation of Mr. Perry for quite some time now. For those who do not know, Madea is the matriarch of her family who is both maternal and vicious. She is played with ferocity and tenderness by Perry himself. Perry also plays two other characters. One is Uncle Joe, the perpetually perverse and crass brother of Madea, and the other is Brian, the straight-laced son of Joe and overall nice guy who happens to be an attorney. This is fiction remember. As well as being the film's star, writer, and producer, Perry also directs the film. Like I said before, the man is seriously Black Jesus. If you doubt the man's influence, question his reputation as an artist to an African-American. It is like that.
I'll cut to the chase. The film is a sequel to Diary of a Mad Black Woman, which also features Perry in the same multiple roles. In this film, Madea is forced by a court-order to take on teenage runaway Nikki(Keke Parker). Of course all Nikki needs is some of Madea's tough love, which equates to plenty of corporal punishment and a couple strategically-placed hugs. Madea's house is VERY full. Her niece Vanessa (Lisa Arrindell Anderson) and her two children live there. Madea also babysits Brian's two kids. Joe lives there as well.
Madea also has an extended family that includes Lisa (Rochelle Aytes) who is in a verbally and physically abusive relationship with her boyfriend (Blair Underwood). Lisa's plight is complicated even further by her mother, Victoria (Lynn Whitfield), who is the African-American version of Joan Crawford. Victoria is SO far over the top that it is pretty hard to take her character seriously. Her obsession with wealth and the sustaining of wealth is a tired cliche and it comes off as being tacky on film. The preferential treatment of Lisa over her other daughter, Vanessa, is also pretty tired. I could explain the history behind the strained relationship but it would take too long and African-American melodrama is WAY too complicated to try to dissect.
The first thing that I did not like about the film was that all of the male leads were WAY too attractive. It looked like a catalog for Muscle and Fitness magazine. It's one thing to be attractive, but to perpetuate said attractiveness with them being honest, decent, child-friendly, cultured, and a God-fearing Christian. I mean c'mon!!!! Could we keep this scenario semi-real?
The second problem I had with the film was that the character of Victoria. There is no way a woman this evil can exist. I have heard of murderers and people who seem to not have a semblance of respect for the sanctity of human life, but at least those people are aware that their actions have consequence and can see a world that extends beyond themselves. The repercussions of Victoria's malice are beyond her comprehension, which makes any possible "redemption" effort to be problematic.
The last problem I saw with the film is not a real "problem" as much as a trend that I notice in film that I think is creating negative consequences. I give Mr. Perry credit for creating a film with an all African-American cast and trying to establish a positive values, but the marketing of the film was off. The film is seen by most as a "black" movie. Film is supposed to transcend race. Film is supposed to be about entertainment and, hopefully, enlightenment. This film does have value, but it is not just a "black" movie. The film does stress the importance of family values, strength through unity, and the need to be respectful to oneself. Those values are meaningful to every ethnicity. What is a "black" movie anyhow? What is a "Caucasian" film? Is there a difference? I hope that Hollywood will abandon the practice are marketing to a specific "target audience" and make movies that all people can go see. It also might help out the struggling box office numbers as well. Film is the ultimate medium and it represents a plethora of possibilities that should not be limited because of the pigment in a person's skin.

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

Review: The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada

I was on spring break last week (which is a mystery because it recently JUST hit the spring season) and decided that I would check out the first offering from director Tommy Lee Jones. I had seen a preview of the film before and it looked decent, or at least better than the rest of the regurgitated nonsense filling most multiplexes. I was very pleasantly surprised when I saw the film. It offered something that most films forget is necessary, a plot. The film reminded of Lone Star by John Sayles. The pacing was the same and the view of the south was captured in a realistic and non-glamorized way. I suppose its nice to have people who look like actual people and not an Abercrombie model in a cowboy hat.
The story actually has a pretty simple premise. As an audience, we are first introduced to the deceased corpse of Melquiades Estrada and how he is discovered. Even from the beginning of the film, the dialogue captures the audience in a way that makes all the events and actions seem plausible. Tommy Lee Jones plays Pete Perkins, Melquiades's friend and confidant. His performance is one of controlled passion. What I mean is that the relationship between Pete and Melquiades is based on a friendship that transcends their differing cultures. Most films do not construct friendship as a theme. Friendship is usually a cheap detail and not a lasting bond, on which a code of conduct is established and adhered to.
Jones's character goes to extreme lengths to find out the real reason why Melquiades died. He discovers that he was killed accidentally by Texas border patrol officer Mike Norton (Barry Pepper) who thought he represented a "threat". As a character refers to Pepper, "That bastard is without redemption." His character can be seen as a temperamental brat. His wife Lou Ann (January Jones) is not much better. Her character is limited in the fact that she is seen mostly pining for a life of interest in the local diner. She is a full-functioning contradiction because she craves a life of travel and new experiences, but when those experiences do not meet her lofty expectations she becomes pretentious and callous. But then again how satisfied can she be if her husband pleasures her between commercials?
The film has flashbacks that serve to make the characters rich and vibrant. The love rectangle between Jones's character, the waitress at the resident diner Mariana (Vanessa Bauche), the town sheriff (Dwight Yokam), and the waitress's husband/cook (Richard Dillard). I found it particularly amusing that there was an obvious infidelity going on, yet the marriage could remain pristine. Even though her character was morally laxed, I found Mariana to be the most enjoyable character because she could shift her affections so quickly and transition so effortlessly between men that it came off as humor.
Once Jones's character finds out that it was Mike Norton who was responsible he goes out to get revenge/pay his last respects/fulfill Melquiades's last wish. He kidnaps Norton and takes him across the border to bury Melquiades's home in Mexico. The voyage is one of discovery for both Perkins and Norton. For Norton, he gets to run across some of the immigrants he had previously harassed (which is pretty hilarious by the way). Norton is supposed to learn a lesson but I don't think he can comprehend the depth of emotion that is necessary to truly express regret and remorse.
The central theme of the film is friendship and the lengths to which one person will go to preserve a promise to another. The life of being a ranch hand is one which isolates the self from the rest of the world. The film effectively displays the solitude that is generated through daily life. That is why friendship is a rarity that most take for granted. The emotional bond between two people is sacred and it is nice to see a film that captures this principle at its very core. All of the characters have their own qualities that make them dynamic. Those who do go see the film, please be warned that the body of Melquiades does decompose throughout the course of the film and it does get to be kind of graphic. Nonetheless, Mr. Jones does a fine job framing a modern western which still has roots to the classics like The Searchers and Once Upon a Time in the West and maintaining the general aesthetic.